UCLChampions League Match Reports

AEK Athens vs LASK 1-0 - Champions League Matchday 1 Match Report

8 September 2026ALLWYN Arena30.221 attendanceMatchday 1

AEK Athens and LASK met at ALLWYN Arena in the UEFA Champions League league phase, and the shape of the match explained the scoreline far better than the bare numbers do.

AEK Athens - LASK 1-0

AEK Athens and LASK met at ALLWYN Arena in the UEFA Champions League league phase, and the shape of the match explained the scoreline far better than the bare numbers do. LASK went down to 1-0 and spent the remainder of the evening trying to pull the game back. The turning point came at the 21 minute mark, when Răzvan Marin found the far corner, and everything that followed was played in that new landscape. AEK Athens won 1-0 and carried the points home. 30221 supporters filled ALLWYN Arena, and the noise never really left the players alone. Neither side arrived in the best form: the last five results read W W D W W for AEK Athens and L W W W W for LASK, and both sets of players knew what a slip would cost.

Match facts

  • Date: 2026-09-08
  • Kick-off: 16:45 UTC
  • Venue: ALLWYN Arena, Athína (Athens), Greece (31100)
  • Attendance: 30221
  • Referee: Luís Godinho (Portugal)
  • Competition: UEFA Champions League 2026/2027 - Matchday 1
  • Starting line-ups: AEK Athens (4-4-2, Coach: Marko Nikolić) / LASK (3-5-2, Coach: Dietmar Kühbauer)
  • Scorers: Răzvan Marin 21'

AEK Athens lined up with Alberto Brignoli, Lazaros Rota, Harold Moukoudi, Filipe Relvas, Stavros Pilios, Lovro Majer, Milán Vitális, Răzvan Marin, Aboubakary Koïta, Barnabás Varga, Luka Jović in a 4-4-2, while LASK answered with Lukas Jungwirth, Xavier Mbuyamba, Alemão, Andrés Andrade, Kasper Jørgensen, Robert Ljubičić, Melayro Bogarde, Sascha Horvath, George Bello, Moses Usor, Christoph Lang in a 3-5-2. Marko Nikolić and Dietmar Kühbauer led their respective sides from the touchline, and both had a plan for the first hour that they wanted to keep intact.

Goals and key moments

Goal details, minutes and scorers are the part of the record that separate one evening from another. At the 21' mark, Răzvan Marin found the far corner, with supplying the pass that made it possible, and 1-0 was the consequence. It was a chance worth 0.049 expected goals, which is exactly why it was worth taking. Not every opening was taken, though, and the chances that were missed told their own story. Taken together, the goals gave the evening a shape that the scoreline on its own never explained.

The tactical picture

AEK Athens started in 4-4-2 under Marko Nikolić, while LASK answered with 3-5-2 under Dietmar Kühbauer, and those two shapes decided most of what happened on the field. Neither manager was willing to hand the central ground over for free, and the shape of the game followed that refusal. The midfield was the part of the pitch both sides wanted, and the numbers show who managed to take it. The side that pressed high won the second ball, which left the other team unable to build from the back and forced them into hopeful passes. The width of the pitch worked against the team that kept attacking down the same flank, and they were closed down every time. Transitions were the story: one side moved the ball forward at speed, the other could not. The tactical conversation between the two benches was as much a part of the evening as the movement of the ball itself.

Tactical reading

AEK Athens set up in a 4-4-2 against the 3-5-2 of LASK, and the two shapes decided how the ball actually moved: AEK Athens completed 405 passes at 84% accuracy while LASK answered with 426 and 81%. The duel numbers underline the same story, as AEK Athens won 64 duels against 40 for LASK, completed 16 tackles to 22 and read 15 passes compared with 7. Chance creation was the decisive column of the table, with AEK Athens generating 4 clear chances and 10 shots from inside the box against 3 and 5, which is exactly why the goalkeepers had to make 3 and 2 saves between them. Marko Nikolić trusted his 4-4-2 and Dietmar Kühbauer answered with 3-5-2, and the final 1-0 reflects which of the two plans survived the second-half pressure better.

Statistical comparison

The statistical picture is as revealing as the scoreline itself. Expected goals told the sharper story: 1.71 for AEK Athens against 0.72 for LASK. AEK Athens attempted 18 shots to LASK's 11, with 4 on target against 3. Possession finished at 49 per cent for AEK Athens against 51 per cent for LASK, and it is worth noting which side actually used it. AEK Athens won 7 corners to LASK's 3, and that is where most of the set-piece danger came from. AEK Athens completed 341 of 405 passes against 345 of 426 for LASK, a difference that shows how differently the two sides circulated the ball. Fouls were committed 7 times by AEK Athens and 15 by LASK, with 0 and 0 red cards in the official count. The goalkeepers made 3 and 2 saves respectively, and on a night like this that work decides how the result is remembered. The duels went 64 to 40, which is usually the cleanest single indicator of who was prepared to spend effort on the ball. Tackles were completed 16 times by AEK Athens and 22 by LASK, and the duels that followed tell the same story as the rest of the evening.

Discipline and substitutions

Discipline and substitutions shaped the second half more than the scoreline suggests. AEK Athens collected 1 yellow cards and LASK 2, and the caution count of 4 in total meant the referee had to manage a game that was becoming increasingly physical around the halfway line. Both coaches used their changes: 3 by AEK Athens and 3 by LASK, with the last substitution of the evening coming late. The emotional temperature of the evening rose and fell with the challenges and with the decisions taken by both benches. Luís Godinho took charge of the match and had a relatively straightforward evening by the standards of the competition.

Player of the match and the standout performers

Individual performances separated the two teams across a full ninety minutes. Răzvan Marin of AEK Athens was the player of the match with a rating of 8.7, and every touch that mattered carried his name on it. For AEK Athens, the best individual rating belonged to Răzvan Marin, and for LASK it belonged to Xavier Mbuyamba. The gap between the best performances on each side was the reason the result never really looked as comfortable as it was. Across the two squads the highest individual ratings read Răzvan Marin (8.69), Lazaros Rota (8.35), Aboubakary Koïta (8.00), Lovro Majer (7.80).

Standout performers

AEK Athens found its best performer in Răzvan Marin while LASK leaned on Xavier Mbuyamba, and the man of the match award went to Răzvan Marin with a rating of 8.7. The spread across both squads was unusually narrow: Răzvan Marin (8.69), Lazaros Rota (8.35), Aboubakary Koïta (8.00), Lovro Majer (7.80) were the four highest-rated players of the evening and every one of them left a mark on the result. The individual numbers explain the scoreline as well, because the side that finished with more shots on target (4 against 3) and the better expected goal value (1.71 against 0.72) took the points that its performance had earned. Corner kicks finished at 7 to 3, and that small edge matters in a fixture decided by a single moment rather than by volume of chances.

What the result means for the league phase

AEK Athens on points from 3 matches, in 29 place with a goal difference of -5, and LASK on points from 3 matches, in 24 place with a goal difference of -3. AEK Athens arrived with W W D W W in their last five and LASK with L W W W W, so the result fits the run both of them have been on. For the winner the three points are banked and the group is a shade closer to settled; for the other side the work still to be done, and this result has made that plain. What the numbers cannot show is how hard the result was worked for, and how differently the two sides will remember it. The next round of the league phase will tell more: whoever adjusts first in the coming days will be the one who controls the group.

Source: worldfootballportal.com